Beyond BLEU: A Case for Redefining Sign Language Translation Benchmarks

arXiv:2609.03734v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: BLEU-4 is the standard metric for evaluating sign language translation (SLT), but spoken-language metrics may not adequately reflect sign language proficiency.

The multimodal, low-resource context of SLT allows models to exploit spurious correlations and spoken-language priors, rather than learning stronger sign representations.

In this paper, we evaluate the relationship between spatio-temporal understanding and BLEU-4 across six SLT models on Phoenix-2014T and CSL-Daily, showing that gains in BLEU-4 are not on their own evidence of better sign language understanding. This work introduces an alternative inspired by language-learning assessment, using an open-weight-LLM QA protocol that measures salient content preservation.

It aligns more closely with human rankings and is six to seven times more paraphrase-invariant than BLEU-4. Applied to SLT, this protocol targets content transfer, is more robust to train-test overlap, and gives a different picture of the field: the five gloss-free systems are largely within noise of one another on Phoenix-2014T, while the gloss-supervised system stands 9.3 points higher, a gap invisible to BLEU-4.