Do Multimodal LLMs See Before They Read? Diagnosing Contextual Sycophancy

arXiv:2609.00067v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: External text can override conflicting image evidence in multimodal large language models, a failure we call multimodal contextual sycophancy.

We introduce a 998-case diagnostic that independently varies visual evidence, commonsense priors, and external text, and probe when this failure arises by moving the information boundary around a context-blind visual witness.

On abnormal images paired with Gemini-generated false text, GPT-5.1 scores 7.9% under joint conditioning, 49.7% when the context-blind witness report is scored directly, 63.7% under a matched two-call witness-arbiter pipeline that exposes the witness to the text, and 84.2% under System-2 Visual Arbitration (S2VA), which withholds the text from the witness.

Across six models, S2VA improves over the direct witness report by 19.7 to 44.1 points, with all paired 95% confidence intervals excluding zero. The best information boundary is not uniform: textual context scaffolds some models, and a GPT-4o-regenerated subset changes the relative ordering of joint conditioning, Witness-Only, and S2VA.

Contextual sycophancy is therefore sensitive to when text is introduced, as well as to the model and context source.